The revelation that nearly one-third (371) of judicial positions in IndiaS high courts remain vacant underscores meaningful challenges to India’s judiciary system. While procedural guidelines in the Memorandum of Procedure require timely recommendations from collegiums to preempt judicial shortages, non-adherence has created bottlenecks affecting both governance continuity and public access to justice.
This vacancy issue could exacerbate delays in case resolution-a longstanding problem within India’s judiciary-possibly increasing pendency rates across already burdened courts. Bridging communication gaps between high court collegiums, the Supreme Court Collegium, state authorities, and central government remains critical to ensuring an efficient appointment process. the data reflects systemic hurdles rather than partisan failure or success; resolving them may require reforms or strict enforcement mechanisms related to timelines outlined by MoP.
For further discussion: Read More