Sadhvi Pragya Slams Ex-Mumbai Top Cop Param Bir Singh in Malegaon Blast Case

Speedy Summary

• BJP leader Sadhvi Pragya singh Thakur accused former Commissioner of Police, Param Bir Singh, and the Maharashtra ATS team of torturing her during the Malegaon blast investigation.
• She claimed that she was forced to implicate prominent leaders like PM Narendra Modi, Yogi Adityanath, Mohan Bhagwat, Ram Madhav, and others in a “politically motivated conspiracy.”
• Sadhvi Pragya alleged that central agencies were misused by the Congress government at both state and national levels to create fear and fabricate charges against Hindus.
• Criticizing Congress for its alleged “appeasement politics” towards Muslims, she called their actions treasonous and accused them of labeling Hindus as part of “saffron terror.”
• A special NIA court recently acquitted all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case due to lack of evidence. The court ordered compensation for victims’ families and injured individuals.

Indian Opinion Analysis
The accusations leveled by Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur against Param Bir Singh and ATS raise serious questions related to ethical conduct during sensitive investigations like that of the Malegaon blast case.Her claims regarding political interference suggest potential misuse of investigative mechanisms under previous governments but lack corroboration beyond her personal testimony. With allegations involving torture outside legal frameworks stirred alongside broader criticisms aimed at Congress’s political approach-such as “appeasement politics” or “fabricating saffron terror”-the discourse touches upon deeper concerns over fairness in governance during high-profile cases.

The recent closure with an acquittal from the NIA court represents a significant milestone after nearly two decades but leaves lingering impacts on public trust in impartial justice delivery systems across India. Irrespective of partisan divides surrounding such cases, ensuring judicial independence remains essential both for communal harmony as well deterrent procedural accountability within institutions enforcing law integrity broadening larger systemic debates!

Read More