Supreme Court Flags Low Conviction Rate in ED Cases

Swift Summary

• Two separate Supreme Court benches criticized the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) for “poor conviction rates” in money laundering cases despite numerous complaints and arrests.
• Chief Justice B.R. Gavai observed that ED has effectively incarcerated people for years without achieving convictions in many cases.
• Justice Ujjal Bhuyan noted that out of about 400 Enforcement Case Details Reports (ECIRs) filed, fewer than 10 convictions have been recorded to date.
• Concerns were raised about individuals spending four to five years in custody before being acquitted, harming ED’s public image.
• Additional Solicitor General S.V.Raju defended ED by blaming influential accused parties who move assets abroad and employ delay tactics in trials through repeated applications seeking discharge.
• Justice bhuyan emphasized proper investigation methods must be used and rejected excuses based on delays caused by external factors like the law or Constitution.
• Suggestions from the court included establishing special courts with dedicated judges for handling PMLA-related trials.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The observations made by the Supreme Court highlight critical efficiency gaps within India’s enforcement mechanisms under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The startling disparity between the high number of registered ECIRs and successful convictions raises concerns about investigatory practices, prolonged detentions without resolution, and potential administrative inefficiencies within ED operations.

The skepticism expressed regarding influential accused parties hampering investigations indicates challenges faced by agencies dealing with global financial networks linked to foreign jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands. However, calls for specialized courts suggest a pragmatic approach to addressing legal bottlenecks while maintaining justice system integrity.

For India, enhancing institutional transparency, adopting advanced investigative methods suited for complex financial crimes, and reducing trial delays could significantly improve enforcement outcomes under PMLA-and restore public confidence both domestically and internationally.

Read more: Source Link