The CAT’s decision on this matter underscores a critically important principle: employers hold discretion over transfers unless procedural or legal violations are evident. By dismissing this challenge, it sets a precedent reaffirming limited judicial interference in internal administrative decisions unless exceptional circumstances prevail.
However, what stands out here is the tribunal’s critique of ED officers’ approach, which may have implications for institutional accountability within government agencies like ED. Such comments highlight concerns over clarity in handling employee grievances while maintaining public confidence in regulatory institutions tasked wiht enforcing critical laws against corruption or illicit financial activities.
The allegations against Radhakrishnan show how sensitive higher-ranking transfers can become when credibility questions arise-adding pressure to strike a balance between operational needs and safeguarding fairness within bureaucratic systems.
Read more: Source