Supreme Court to Rule on Plea Against Stray Dog Removal in Delhi-NCR

IO_AdminAfrica6 hours ago6 Views

Fast Summary

  • Supreme Court Directive: The Supreme Court of India reserved its order on a plea to stay its August 11, 2025 directive for removing stray dogs in delhi and relocating them to shelters within six to eight weeks. No interim relief was granted.
  • Judicial Observations: Justice Vikram nath’s Bench noted the failure of local authorities in managing the issue, while Solicitor general Tushar Mehta emphasized public health risks citing fatalities from rabies and dog bites, primarily involving children.
  • Advocate Concerns:

– Senior advocate Kapil Sibal argued that relocating stray dogs violates Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules,2023.
– Advocate A.M. Singhvi pointed out insufficient shelter capacity for strays and called the order impractical.

  • Previous Orders & Activist Outrage: Earlier Supreme Court rulings mandated compassionate treatment of strays under ABC Rules. The current directive faced backlash from animal rights activists citing logistical challenges and risks of cruelty due to inadequate facilities for over eight lakh stray dogs.
  • Background Context: Stray dog attacks on children have been increasing, prompting stricter judicial intervention by Justice Pardiwala’s initial suo motu decision. Chief Justice B.R. Gavai reassigned the case recently following concerns raised about prior rulings’ disregard.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The escalating public health concern related to stray dog attacks has underscored a longstanding urban governance issue in India-balancing human safety with animal welfare principles. The Supreme Court’s directive reflects an urgent response but raises meaningful legal and logistical challenges that highlight gaps in civic infrastructure planning. With allegations of non-compliance with ABC Rules and no adequate shelter systems in place, questions arise about the feasibility and ethics of executing such large-scale relocation drives within tight timelines.This case symbolizes broader systemic failures at municipal levels where reactive rather than preventative measures dominate policymaking regarding both human safety and animal management frameworks. Moving forward, pragmatic adherence to humane programs like sterilization coupled with enhanced public health awareness may offer sustainable solutions without sparking controversy or avoidable harm.

Read More

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Leave a reply

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Stay Informed With the Latest & Most Important News

I consent to receive newsletter via email. For further information, please review our Privacy Policy

Advertisement

Loading Next Post...
Follow
Sign In/Sign Up Sidebar Search Trending 0 Cart
Popular Now
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

Cart
Cart updating

ShopYour cart is currently is empty. You could visit our shop and start shopping.