Congress Criticizes PM’s I-Day Praise for RSS as Attempt to Appease Sangh

Quick Summary

• Prime Minister Narendra Modi delivered his Independence Day speech from the ramparts of the Red Fort in New Delhi on August 15, 2025.
• The Congress criticized the PM’s address, particularly his reference to the RSS and described it as troubling and a breach of constitutional secular values.
• Congress leader Jairam Ramesh accused Modi’s speech of being “stale, hypocritical, insipid,” highlighting recycled slogans like ‘Viksit Bharat’ and ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ with few measurable outcomes.
• Opposition statements implied desperation to appease RSS leadership ahead of PM Modi’s 75th birthday next month.
• Critiques included unfulfilled promises on semiconductor manufacturing, farmer income doubling strategies lacking legal guarantees for MSP or farm loan waivers, insufficient job creation measures, and economic challenges such as unemployment and inequality.
• Concerns were raised about voter disenfranchisement in Bihar due to Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
• Key criticisms revolved around alleged erosion of federalism and undermining constitutional institutions like the Election Commission.

Indian Opinion Analysis

Prime Minister Narendra modi’s Independence Day speech drew sharp scrutiny from political opponents for alleged politicization centered around RSS mentions. while speeches during such national celebrations often reflect governance goals alongside aspirational rhetoric, critics emphasized a lack of ample achievements accompanying repeated promises in sectors like semiconductors manufacturing or farmer welfare reforms. Further examination into electoral revision strategies in states like Bihar warrants transparent dialog from authorities to avoid perceptions regarding disenfranchisement.

The focus also turned toward democratic processes; Congress highlighted concerns over institutional integrity linked to federal dynamics between central policies impacting state-run opposition governments-another subject deserving careful discourse within India’s democratic framework. Such criticism marks broader debates not just about accountability but inclusivity needed when addressing citizens’ economic distress during monumental events symbolizing unity.

Read more