Quick Summary
- Kerala Governor Rajendra Arlekar urged the Supreme Court to exclude Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan from the selection process for Vice Chancellors (VCs) of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University and Kerala Digital University.
- Governor contended that neither university’s Acts nor UGC Regulations permit a role for the CM in selecting VCs, citing concerns over autonomy and potential conflict of interest.
- He filed an submission seeking modification of parts of the Supreme Court’s August 18 order appointing Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia as chairperson of search-cum-selection committees, opposing inclusion of State nominees in the panel.
- UGC Regulations mandate independence and expertise among search commitee members while requiring inclusion of a nominee from UGC’s chairperson.
- The Governor emphasized his prerogative to select VCs from names provided by independent search committees while maintaining discretion vested in him as Chancellor.
indian Opinion Analysis
The debate surrounding VC appointments underscores enduring tensions between state governments and Governors regarding university governance. The Kerala case highlights broader concerns about higher education autonomy versus political administrative control. While Governors legally hold prerogatives under UGC guidelines, disagreements over State involvement reflect differing interpretations on institutional independence.
The implications for India are significant-ensuring VC appointments align strictly with UGC norms can reinforce higher education standards but may also limit dialog between elected representatives and university administrations. Resolution through judicial intervention suggests ongoing challenges in balancing federalism principles with governance accountability within India’s complex higher education framework.
Read more