Trump’s First 100 Days Outpace Project 2025 in Radical Moves

### Quick Summary:
– former U.S. President Donald Trump has reportedly implemented policies aligning with *Project 2025*, a controversial blueprint by the Heritage Foundation to transform federal governance.
– The plan includes replacing civil servants with loyalists, commercializing government services like weather forecasting, scrubbing equity initiatives from agencies, and boosting fossil fuel drilling on public lands.
– Approximately one-third of the 300+ proposals in Project 2025 are either completed or in progress under Trump’s management.
– Environmental measures include halting green grants, rolling back climate regulations, and expanding energy extraction projects on public lands.
– Executive orders bypassing Congress have achieved such measures but triggered legal battles over potential illegality and constitutional conflicts between judicial and executive powers.
– Critics have categorized Project 2025’s implementation as chaotic, undermining governance while inflaming court challenges to its legality.

—

### Indian Opinion Analysis:
The developments surrounding Project 2025 represent an aggressive use of executive power to rapidly enact partisan policy changes. While these actions primarily pertain to U.S. domestic matters, thier implications extend globally-especially for nations like India navigating shared environmental challenges. As fossil fuel expansion accelerates under Trump’s second term, international cooperation on climate action could face setbacks at global forums.

For India specifically, weakened U.S. climate leadership might complicate funding avenues or technology partnerships targeting renewable energy goals under initiatives like India’s National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC). Simultaneously, this evolving scenario also points toward opportunities for India to assert diplomatic leadership in multilateral spaces were sustainability policies gain traction amid shifting geopolitics.

Global focus remains not onyl on whether these sweeping actions can withstand judicial scrutiny but also whether they set precedents others might seek to emulate-potentially reshaping administrative practices internationally.

Read More