Nepal Leaders, Lawyers Decry Parliament Dissolution as ‘Unconstitutional

Swift Summary

• Nepal’s President Ram Chandra Paudel dissolved the House of Representatives on September 12, 2025, following a cabinet suggestion by interim Prime Minister Sushila Karki.
• Fresh parliamentary elections have been scheduled for March 21, 2026.
• Major political parties and the Nepal Bar Association (NBA) have condemned the dissolution as “unconstitutional” and detrimental to democracy.
• Nepali Congress (NC), the largest political party in Nepal, stated this move jeopardizes democratic achievements and violates constitutional principles.
• CPN-UML General Secretary Shankar Pokharel expressed concerns over contradictions in past constitutional interpretations regarding parliament dissolution.
• The NBA described the action as arbitrary and undermining constitutional supremacy, warning it erodes public trust in democratic institutions.

!Nepal Army at President house
barbed wires placed outside the President House as security heightens after anti-government protests in Kathmandu. Image source: PTI

Read More

Indian Opinion Analysis

The decision to dissolve Nepal’s parliament raises significant questions about adherence to a democratic framework within South asia. India’s close geographical ties with Nepal provide reason for concern about regional stability.Political discord often disrupts economic and social structures; thus, any prolonged instability could indirectly impact India’s interests-especially along shared border areas.

This progress also highlights broader challenges of sustaining multiparty democracies in countries navigating complex transitions like federalism. From India’s perspective-as an advocate of democratic values-the robustness of constitutional norms is key to long-term peace and progress across neighboring states. While remaining neutral toward internal matters of another nation, India’s policymakers may need vigilance regarding ripple effects that such events can carry across borders.