– The SIT declared all allegations against Vantara as “entirely baseless.”
– Claims about acquiring animals for carbon credit profit were dismissed due to the absence of any domestic or international framework recognizing such credits for wildlife rescue or upkeep.
– The SIT confirmed that Vantara’s funding is entirely philanthropic without links to monetized environmental mechanisms.
Images from the article:
!80/PTI07202025_RPT045A.jpg”>Caption describing image
The supreme Court’s clean chit to Vantara reinforces public trust in institutional mechanisms designed to verify claims made against organizations involved in critical environmental work. This development not only clears Reliance Foundation of controversy but also highlights gaps between emerging ecological concepts like carbon credits and their current regulatory frameworks. It serves as a reminder that accusations based on incomplete understanding can distract from meaningful conservation efforts.
From an operational viewpoint, this outcome could strengthen philanthropic initiatives focused on wildlife rescue without fear of unwarranted scrutiny. Additionally, it underscores the importance of aligning public policy with global ecological norms to prevent misinformation while fostering transparency in India’s environmental ecosystem.