– The Pandalam Palace, citing rituals and its dissatisfaction with unresolved issues like withdrawal of cases from 2018 protests regarding women’s entry.
– The Malayaraya Mahasabha, protesting over what it sees as state inaction in restoring its customary rights over sabarimala temple matters.
The Global Ayyappa Sangamam highlights attempts by Kerala’s government to position Sabarimala as an international spiritual hub while fostering inclusivity among communities. However,underlying tensions between stakeholders such as the Pandalam Palace and malayaraya Mahasabha underscore unresolved historical grievances regarding governance and customs tied to religious traditions.
The conspicuous absence of some key groups reflects resistance toward broader integration without addressing community-specific demands or sensitivities around rituals. this dynamic hints at challenges in balancing state-led modernization efforts with deeply rooted religious practices.
Administrative hiccups – symbolized by Tamil Nadu Minister’s reported dissatisfaction – raise questions about execution during high-profile events aimed at inter-state cooperation.
For all its hurdles,this conclave fosters dialog across states while spotlighting India’s pluralistic heritage symbolized through platforms like these for exchange among political leaders and socio-cultural organizations alike.
Read more: Source