HC Overturns Maintenance Order, Cites Wife’s Adultery

Fast Summary

• Chhattisgarh high Court Ruling: The HC ruled against a woman’s plea for maintenance, citing her adulterous conduct.
• case Background: Both the husband and wife had challenged a Raipur family court’s decision:

– Husband sought annulment of the Rs. 4,000 monthly maintenance order.
– Wife sought an increase to Rs. 20,000.

• Key Evidence:

– Husband’s counsel presented evidence that the wife was in an adulterous relationship with his younger brother.- Divorce decree on September 8, 2023, cited adultery as grounds for dissolution of marriage.

• Section Cited: CrPC section 125(4), which disallows maintenance for a wife living in adultery or leaving marital home without valid reason.
• Counterarguments by Wife’s Counsel:

– Claimed there was no ongoing illicit relationship qualifying as “living in adultery.”
– Argued that Rs. 4,000 maintenance was insufficient due to lack of independent income and husband’s alleged multiple revenue sources.

• High Court Judgment:

– Deemed divorce decree on grounds of adultery as legal proof under section CrPC section125(4).
– Allowed husband’s petition and annulled family court order for maintenance payment.

!representative image

Indian Opinion Analysis

this decision by the Chhattisgarh High Court underscores the importance of legal provisions like CrPC Section125(4) that clarify eligibility criteria for spousal maintenance post-divorce. It highlights how courts consider documented evidence-such as divorce decrees-when adjudicating claims related to estranged marital responsibilities.

While it reinforces accountability within matrimonial disputes, complexities remain regarding interpretations such as “living in adultery.” The dismissal of even enhanced maintenance poses ethical questions about financial support when one partner lacks independent income but is deemed disqualified due to past behavior. This case could set significant precedent concerning how allegations such as extramarital affairs interact with existing laws governing spousal support and may prompt future debates over balancing fairness with penalizing misconduct.

Read More