Three Way Split in Congress

kisded kisdedUncategorized14 hours ago2 Views

There is a Republican split in congress. Republicans can only pass bills when they are unified.

A split Republican Party means gridlock with no bills passing. There were some senators and some in the house who were wanting to go hardcore on the deficit. This also would mean no bills passed to harm Elon. It also means the no bill passage route means the 2017 tax cuts expire. No new tax cuts. No new military spending. Actually get the deficit down to about $1 trillion per year. The Deficit hawks negotiate from the default no bills as a baseline.

About 10-15 Republican senators align with this deficit-hawk philosophy. However, not all of them may oppose this specific bill if it includes provisions they support or if party pressure sways them. For now, let’s consider this range as the potential pool of like-minded senators.

Party leadership might pressure some senators to support the bill, reducing defections. Let’s adjust:

Suppose only 5 deficit hawks (e.g., Rand Paul, Mike Lee, and a few others) hold firm, and Musk sways 2 more, totaling 7 opposed.

Then, 51 – 7 = 44 Republicans for, with 49 Democrats against, plus 7 Republicans against = 56 against. The vote becomes 44-56, still failing.

A split likely prevents the current bill from passing. A vote of 47-53 reflects a plausible scenario where a handful of deficit hawks (like Rand Paul) and Musk-influenced senators defect, leaving Republicans short of the 50 votes needed.

The leadership might then:
Negotiate: Modify the bill with spending cuts or other concessions to win back deficit hawks.

Push Forward: Risk a failed vote to force party unity, though this seems unlikely to succeed.

Abandon: Shelve the bill if opposition grows, especially with Musk amplifying public dissent.

Given the “deficit-increasing” nature and Musk’s opposition, the bill’s fate hinges on Republican unity. With significant resistance, it’s unlikely to muster 50 votes without changes. Thus, it fails initially, prompting revisions or a strategic retreat by the party.

Read More

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Leave a reply

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Stay Informed With the Latest & Most Important News

I consent to receive newsletter via email. For further information, please review our Privacy Policy

Advertisement

Loading Next Post...
Follow
Sign In/Sign Up Sidebar Search Trending 0 Cart
Popular Now
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

Cart
Cart updating

ShopYour cart is currently is empty. You could visit our shop and start shopping.