Now Reading: Unlocking gene regulatory networks for crop resilience and sustainable agriculture
-
01
Unlocking gene regulatory networks for crop resilience and sustainable agriculture
Unlocking gene regulatory networks for crop resilience and sustainable agriculture
Long, T. A., Brady, S. M. & Benfey, P. N. Systems approaches to identifying gene regulatory networks in plants. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 24, 81–103 (2008).
Karlebach, G. & Shamir, R. Modelling and analysis of gene regulatory networks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 770–780 (2008).
Chai, L. E. et al. A review on the computational approaches for gene regulatory network construction. Comput. Biol. Med. 48, 55–65 (2014).
Delgado, F. M. & Gómez-Vela, F. Computational methods for gene regulatory networks reconstruction and analysis: a review. Artif. Intell. Med. 95, 133–145 (2019).
Vijesh, N., Chakrabarti, S. K. & Sreekumar, J. Modeling of gene regulatory networks: a review. JBiSE 6, 223–231 (2013).
Alvarez, J. M., Brooks, M. D., Swift, J. & Coruzzi, G. M. Time-based systems biology approaches to capture and model dynamic gene regulatory networks. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 72, 105–131 (2021).
Bechtold, U. et al. Time-series transcriptomics reveals that AGAMOUS-LIKE22 affects primary metabolism and developmental processes in drought-stressed Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 28, 345–366 (2016).
Gao, H. et al. Days to heading 7, a major quantitative locus determining photoperiod sensitivity and regional adaptation in rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16337–16342 (2014).
Rong, W. et al. The ERF transcription factor TaERF3 promotes tolerance to salt and drought stresses in wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 468–479 (2014).
Clough, E. & Barrett, T. The Gene Expression Omnibus database. Methods Mol. Biol. 1418, 93–110 (2016).
Banf, M. & Rhee, S. Y. Computational inference of gene regulatory networks: approaches, limitations and opportunities. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1860, 41–52 (2017).
Gupta, O. P. et al. From gene to biomolecular networks: a review of evidences for understanding complex biological function in plants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 74, 66–74 (2022).
Araújo, I. S. et al. Stochastic gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun. 8, 2132 (2017).
Mercatelli, D., Scalambra, L., Triboli, L., Ray, F. & Giorgi, F. M. Gene regulatory network inference resources: a practical overview. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1863, 194430 (2020).
Kulkarni, S. R. & Vandepoele, K. Inference of plant gene regulatory networks using data-driven methods: a practical overview. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1863, 194447 (2020).
Hecker, M., Lambeck, S., Toepfer, S., van Someren, E. & Guthke, R. Gene regulatory network inference: data integration in dynamic models—a review. BioSystems 96, 86–103 (2009).
Qian, Y. & Huang, S. C. Improving plant gene regulatory network inference by integrative analysis of multi-omics and high resolution datasets. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 22, 8–15 (2020).
Akers, K. & Murali, T. M. Gene regulatory network inference in single cell biology. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 26, 87–97 (2021).
Yuan, Q. & Duren, Z. Inferring gene regulatory networks from single-cell multiome data using atlas-scale external data. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 247–257 (2025).
Marku, M. & Pancaldi, V. From time-series transcriptomics to gene regulatory networks: a review on inference methods. PLoS Comput. Biol. 19, e1011254 (2023).
Zhao, M., He, W., Tang, J., Zou, Q. & Guo, F. A comprehensive overview and critical evaluation of gene regulatory network inference technologies. Brief. Bioinform. 22, bbab009 (2021).
Pušnik, Ž., Mraz, M., Zimic, N. & Moškon, M. Review and assessment of Boolean approaches for inference of gene regulatory networks. Heliyon 8, e10222 (2022).
Perrin, B.-E. et al. Gene networks inference using dynamic Bayesian networks. Bioinformatics 19, ii138–ii148 (2003).
Mombaerts, L. et al. Dynamical differential expression (DyDE) reveals the period control mechanisms of the Arabidopsis circadian oscillator. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006674 (2019).
Lu, J. et al. Causal network inference from gene transcriptional time-series response to glucocorticoids. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008223 (2021).
Seeger, M. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Int. J. Neural Syst. 14, 69–106 (2004).
Huynh-Thu, V. A. & Geurts, P. dynGENIE3: dynamical GENIE3 for the inference of gene networks from time series expression data. Sci. Rep. 8, 3384 (2018).
Rubiolo, M., Milone, D. H. & Stegmayer, G. Extreme learning machines for reverse engineering of gene regulatory networks from expression time series. Bioinformatics 34, 1253–1260 (2018).
Talukder, A., Barham, C., Li, X. & Hu, H. Interpretation of deep learning in genomics and epigenomics. Brief. Bioinform. 22, bbaa17 (2021).
Hoang, N. V., Park, C., Kamran, M. & Lee, J.-Y. Gene regulatory network guided investigations and engineering of storage root development in root crops. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 762 (2020).
Ikeuchi, M. et al. A gene regulatory network for cellular reprogramming in plant regeneration. Plant Cell Physiol. 59, 765–777 (2018).
Pajoro, A. et al. The (r)evolution of gene regulatory networks controlling Arabidopsis plant reproduction: a two-decade history. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4731–4745 (2014).
Tripathi, R. K. & Wilkins, O. Single cell gene regulatory networks in plants: opportunities for enhancing climate change stress resilience. Plant Cell Environ. 44, 2006–2017 (2021).
Jones, D. M. & Vandepoele, K. Identification and evolution of gene regulatory networks: insights from comparative studies in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 54, 42–48 (2020).
Nolan, T. M. et al. Brassinosteroid gene regulatory networks at cellular resolution in the Arabidopsis root. Science 379, eadf4721 (2023).
Redekar, N., Pilot, G., Raboy, V., Li, S. & Saghai Maroof, M. A. Inference of transcription regulatory network in low phytic acid soybean seeds. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 2029 (2017).
Pink, H. et al. Identification of Lactuca sativa transcription factors impacting resistance to Botrytis cinerea through predictive network inference. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.19.549542 (2023).
Krouk, G., Lingeman, J., Colon, A. M., Coruzzi, G. & Shasha, D. Gene regulatory networks in plants: learning causality from time and perturbation. Genome Biol. 14, 123 (2013).
Muhammad, D., Schmittling, S., Williams, C. & Long, T. A. More than meets the eye: emergent properties of transcription factors networks in Arabidopsis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1860, 64–74 (2017).
Varala, K. et al. Temporal transcriptional logic of dynamic regulatory networks underlying nitrogen signaling and use in plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6494–6499 (2018).
Zhou, P. et al. Meta gene regulatory networks in maize highlight functionally relevant regulatory interactions. Plant Cell 32, 1377–1396 (2020).
Müller, L. M. et al. Differential effects of day/night cues and the circadian clock on the barley transcriptome. Plant Physiol. 183, 765–779 (2020).
Wilkins, O. et al. Egrins (environmental gene regulatory influence networks) in rice that function in the response to water deficit, high temperature, and agricultural environments. Plant Cell 28, 2365–2384 (2016).
Reynoso, M. A. et al. Gene regulatory networks shape developmental plasticity of root cell types under water extremes in rice. Dev. Cell 57, 1177–1192 (2022).
Aalto, A., Viitasaari, L., Ilmonen, P., Mombaerts, L. & Gonçalves, J. Gene regulatory network inference from sparsely sampled noisy data. Nat. Commun. 11, 3493 (2020).
Ko, D. K. & Brandizzi, F. Network-based approaches for understanding gene regulation and function in plants. Plant J. 104, 302–317 (2020).
Subbaroyan, A., Sil, P., Martin, O. C. & Samal, A. Leveraging developmental landscapes for model selection in Boolean gene regulatory networks. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbad160 (2023).
Balcerowicz, M. et al. An early-morning gene network controlled by phytochromes and cryptochromes regulates photomorphogenesis pathways in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 14, 983–996 (2021).
Henriet, C. et al. Proteomics of developing pea seeds reveals a complex antioxidant network underlying the response to sulfur deficiency and water stress. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 2611–2626 (2021).
Depuydt, T., De Rybel, B. & Vandepoele, K. Charting plant gene functions in the multi-omics and single-cell era. Trends Plant Sci. 28, 283–296 (2023).
Cavill, R., Jennen, D., Kleinjans, J. & Briedé, J. J. Transcriptomic and metabolomic data integration. Brief. Bioinform. 17, 891–901 (2016).
Agamah, F. E. et al. Computational approaches for network-based integrative multi-omics analysis. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9, 967205 (2022).
Clark, N. M. et al. Integrated omics networks reveal the temporal signaling events of brassinosteroid response in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 12, 5858 (2021).
Montes, C. et al. Integration of multi-omics data reveals interplay between brassinosteroid and target of rapamycin complex signaling in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 236, 893–910 (2022).
Zhu, W. et al. A translatome–transcriptome multi-omics gene regulatory network reveals the complicated functional landscape of maize. Genome Biol. 24, 60 (2023).
Yang, S. et al. PPGR: a comprehensive perennial plant genomes and regulation database. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D1588–D1596 (2023).
Kang, H. et al. TCOD: an integrated resource for tropical crops. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D1651–D1660 (2024).
Lan, Y. et al. AtMAD: Arabidopsis thaliana multi-omics association database. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D1445–D1451 (2020).
Yang, Z. et al. BnIR: a multi-omics database with various tools for Brassica napus research and breeding. Mol. Plant 16, 775–789 (2023).
Li, C. et al. Single-cell multi-omics in the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 1031–1041 (2023).
Alemu, A. et al. Genomic selection in plant breeding: key factors shaping two decades of progress. Mol. Plant 17, 552–578 (2024).
Schrag, T. A. et al. Beyond genomic prediction: combining different types of omics data can improve prediction of hybrid performance in maize. Genetics 208, 1373–1385 (2018).
Wu, P.-Y. et al. Improvement of prediction ability by integrating multi-omic datasets in barley. BMC Genomics 23, 200 (2022).
Hu, X., Xie, W., Wu, C. & Xu, S. A directed learning strategy integrating multiple omic data improves genomic prediction. Plant Biotechnol. J. 17, 2011–2020 (2019).
Knoch, D. et al. Multi-omics-based prediction of hybrid performance in canola. Theor. Appl. Genet. 134, 1147–1165 (2021).
Hu, H. et al. Multi-omics prediction of oat agronomic and seed nutritional traits across environments and in distantly related populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 134, 4043–4054 (2021).
Wang, K. et al. DNNGP, a deep neural network-based method for genomic prediction using multi-omics data in plants. Mol. Plant 16, 279–293 (2023).
Bhat, J. A. et al. Genomic selection in the era of next generation sequencing for complex traits in plant breeding. Front. Genet. 7, 221 (2016).
Hasan, N., Choudhary, S., Naaz, N., Sharma, N. & Laskar, R. A. Recent advancements in molecular marker-assisted selection and applications in plant breeding programmes. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 19, 128 (2021).
Qin, P. et al. Pan-genome analysis of 33 genetically diverse rice accessions reveals hidden genomic variations. Cell 184, 3542–3558 (2021).
Lozano, R. et al. Comparative evolutionary genetics of deleterious load in sorghum and maize. Nat. Plants 7, 17–24 (2021).
Sun, Y. et al. Divergence in the ABA gene regulatory network underlies differential growth control. Nat. Plants 8, 549–560 (2022).
Lü, P. et al. Genome encode analyses reveal the basis of convergent evolution of fleshy fruit ripening. Nat. Plants 4, 784–791 (2018).
Hickman, R. et al. Architecture and dynamics of the jasmonic acid gene regulatory network. Plant Cell 29, 2086–2105 (2017).
Jamali, S. H., Cockram, J. & Hickey, L. T. Is plant variety registration keeping pace with speed breeding techniques? Euphytica 216, 131 (2020).
Wada, N., Ueta, R., Osakabe, Y. & Osakabe, K. Precision genome editing in plants: state-of-the-art in CRISPR/Cas9-based genome engineering. BMC Plant Biol. 20, 234 (2020).
Li, B., Sun, C., Li, J. & Gao, C. Targeted genome-modification tools and their advanced applications in crop breeding. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 603–622 (2024).
Mishra, R., Joshi, R. K. & Zhao, K. Base editing in crops: current advances, limitations and future implications. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 20–31 (2020).
Molla, K. A., Sretenovic, S., Bansal, K. C. & Qi, Y. Precise plant genome editing using base editors and prime editors. Nat. Plants 7, 1166–1187 (2021).
Li, J. et al. Plant base editing and prime editing: the current status and future perspectives. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 65, 444–467 (2023).
Pan, C., Sretenovic, S. & Qi, Y. CRISPR/dCas-mediated transcriptional and epigenetic regulation in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 60, 101980 (2021).
Jogam, P. et al. A review on CRISPR/Cas-based epigenetic regulation in plants. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 219, 1261–1271 (2022).
Zhang, Y. et al. Expanding the scope of plant genome engineering with Cas12a orthologs and highly multiplexable editing systems. Nat. Commun. 12, 1944 (2021).
Kavuri, N. R., Ramasamy, M., Qi, Y. & Mandadi, K. Applications of CRISPR/Cas13-based RNA editing in plants. Cells 11, 2665 (2022).
Wada, N., Osakabe, K. & Osakabe, Y. Expanding the plant genome editing toolbox with recently developed CRISPR–Cas systems. Plant Physiol. 188, 1825–1837 (2022).
Cassan, O. et al. A gene regulatory network in Arabidopsis roots reveals features and regulators of the plant response to elevated CO2. New Phytol. 239, 992–1004 (2023).
Yuan, Y. et al. Decoding the gene regulatory network of endosperm differentiation in maize. Nat. Commun. 15, 34 (2024).
Zhang, Y. et al. Rice co-expression network analysis identifies gene modules associated with agronomic traits. Plant Physiol. 190, 1526–1542 (2022).
Li, C. et al. A new rice breeding method: CRISPR/Cas9 system editing of the Xa13 promoter to cultivate transgene-free bacterial blight-resistant rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 313–315 (2020).
Peng, A. et al. Engineering canker-resistant plants through CRISPR/Cas9-targeted editing of the susceptibility gene CsLOB1 promoter in citrus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 1509–1519 (2017).
Kumar, J. et al. Efficient protein tagging and cis-regulatory element engineering via precise and directional oligonucleotide-based targeted insertion in plants. Plant Cell 35, 2722–2735 (2023).
Dong, O. X. & Ronald, P. C. Targeted DNA insertion in plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2004834117 (2021).
Dong, O. X. et al. Marker-free carotenoid-enriched rice generated through targeted gene insertion using CRISPR–Cas9. Nat. Commun. 11, 1178 (2020).
Claeys, H. et al. Coordinated gene upregulation in maize through CRISPR/Cas-mediated enhancer insertion. Plant Biotechnol. J. 22, 16–18 (2024).
Sun, C. et al. Precise integration of large DNA sequences in plant genomes using PrimeRoot editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 316–327 (2024).
Vazquez-Vilar, M., Selma, S. & Orzaez, D. The design of synthetic gene circuits in plants: new components, old challenges. J. Exp. Bot. 74, 3791–3805 (2023).
Brophy, J. A. N. et al. Synthetic genetic circuits as a means of reprogramming plant roots. Science 377, 747–751 (2022).
Khan, M. A. et al. CRISPRi-based circuits to control gene expression in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 416–430 (2025).
Staub, J. E., Serquen, F. C. & Gupta, M. Genetic markers, map construction, and their application in plant breeding. HortScience 31, 729–741 (1996).
Pérez-de-Castro, A. M. et al. Application of genomic tools in plant breeding. Curr. Genomics 13, 179–195 (2012).
Chung, Y. S., Choi, S. C., Jun, T.-H. & Kim, C. Genotyping-by-sequencing: a promising tool for plant genetics research and breeding. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 58, 425–431 (2017).
Zhang, H. et al. QTG-seq accelerates QTL fine mapping through QTL partitioning and whole-genome sequencing of bulked segregant samples. Mol. Plant 12, 426–437 (2019).
Jamil, I. N. et al. Systematic multi-omics integration (MOI) approach in plant systems biology. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 944 (2020).
Mounet, F. et al. Gene and metabolite regulatory network analysis of early developing fruit tissues highlights new candidate genes for the control of tomato fruit composition and development. Plant Physiol. 149, 1505–1528 (2009).
Larriba, E., Nicolás-Albujer, M., Sánchez-García, A. B. & Pérez-Pérez, J. M. Identification of transcriptional networks involved in de novo organ formation in tomato hypocotyl explants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 16112 (2022).
Sacco, A., Raiola, A., Calafiore, R., Barone, A. & Rigano, M. M. New insights in the control of antioxidants accumulation in tomato by transcriptomic analyses of genotypes exhibiting contrasting levels of fruit metabolites. BMC Genomics 20, 43 (2019).
Hale, B. et al. Gene regulatory network inference in soybean upon infection by Phytophthora sojae. PLoS ONE 18, e0287590 (2023).
Pradeepkumara, N. et al. Fruit transcriptional profiling of the contrasting genotypes for shelf life reveals the key candidate genes and molecular pathways regulating post-harvest biology in cucumber. Genomics 114, 110273 (2022).
Jaiswal, S. et al. Transcriptomic signature of drought response in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) and development of web-genomic resources. Sci. Rep. 8, 3382 (2018).
Yi, F., Huo, M., Li, J. & Yu, J. Time-series transcriptomics reveals a drought-responsive temporal network and crosstalk between drought stress and the circadian clock in foxtail millet. Plant J. 110, 1213–1228 (2022).
Kaur, B. et al. Omics for the improvement of abiotic, biotic, and agronomic traits in major cereal crops: applications, challenges, and prospects. Plants 10, 1989 (2021).
De Clercq, I. et al. Integrative inference of transcriptional networks in Arabidopsis yields novel ROS signalling regulators. Nat. Plants 7, 500–513 (2021).
Chen, Y. et al. A wheat integrative regulatory network from large-scale complementary functional datasets enables trait-associated gene discovery for crop improvement. Mol. Plant 16, 393–414 (2023).
Wei, X. et al. Genomic investigation of 18,421 lines reveals the genetic architecture of rice. Science 385, eadm8762 (2024).
Munns, R. & Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 651–681 (2008).
Shrivastava, P. & Kumar, R. Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 22, 123–131 (2015).
Ruz, G. A., Timmermann, T. & Goles, E. Reconstruction of a GRN model of salt stress response in Arabidopsis using genetic algorithms. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB) 1–8 (2015).
Hu, J. et al. Time-series transcriptome comparison reveals the gene regulation network under salt stress in soybean (Glycine max) roots. BMC Plant Biol. 22, 157 (2022).
Wang, R. et al. Comparative analysis of salt responsive gene regulatory networks in rice and Arabidopsis. Comput. Biol. Chem. 85, 107188 (2020).
Wang, B. et al. The transcriptional regulatory network of hormones and genes under salt stress in tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1115593 (2023).
Hu, W., Ren, Q., Chen, Y., Xu, G. & Qian, Y. Genome-wide identification and analysis of WRKY gene family in maize provide insights into regulatory network in response to abiotic stresses. BMC Plant Biol. 21, 427 (2021).
Song, L. et al. A transcription factor hierarchy defines an environmental stress response network. Science 354, aag1550 (2016).
Ecker, J. & Song, L. Environmental stress response transcriptional regulatory network. US patent 20,180,112,228 (2018).
Tian, H. et al. A novel family of transcription factors conserved in angiosperms is required for ABA signalling. Plant Cell Environ. 40, 2958–2971 (2017).
Chen, S. et al. Knockout of the entire family of AITR genes in Arabidopsis leads to enhanced drought and salinity tolerance without fitness costs. BMC Plant Biol. 21, 137 (2021).
Li, G. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing of NTAITRs, a family of transcription repressor genes, leads to enhanced drought tolerance in tobacco. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 15268 (2022).
Wang, T. et al. Mutation of GmAITR genes by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing results in enhanced salinity stress tolerance in soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 779598 (2021).
Wang, T. et al. Evolution of AITR family genes in cotton and their functions in abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Biol. 23, 58–68 (2021).
Gao, Y. et al. Diversity and redundancy of the ripening regulatory networks revealed by the fruitENCODE and the new CRISPR/Cas9 CNR and NOR mutants. Hortic. Res. 6, 39 (2019).
Cai, J. et al. FvMYB79 positively regulates strawberry fruit softening via transcriptional activation of FvPME38. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 101 (2021).
Lakhwani, D. et al. Genome wide identification of MADS box gene family in Musa balbisiana and their divergence during evolution. Gene 836, 146666 (2022).
Nobori, T. et al. A rare PRIMER cell state in plant immunity. Nature 638, 197–205 (2025).
Lee, T. A. et al. A single-nucleus atlas of seed-to-seed development in Arabidopsis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.23.533992 (2023).
Swift, J. et al. Exaptation of ancestral cell-identity networks enables C4 photosynthesis. Nature 636, 143–150 (2024).
Ferrari, C., Manosalva Pérez, N. & Vandepoele, K. MINI-EX: integrative inference of single-cell gene regulatory networks in plants. Mol. Plant 15, 1807–1824 (2022).
Philips, T. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): transgenic crops and recombinant DNA technology. Nat. Educ. 1, 213 (2008).
Bawa, A. S. & Anilakumar, K. R. Genetically modified foods: safety, risks and public concerns—a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 50, 1035–1046 (2013).
Friedrichs, S. et al. Meeting report of the OECD conference on ‘Genome Editing: Applications in Agriculture—Implications for Health, Environment and Regulation’. Transgenic Res. 28, 419–463 (2019).
Tian, Z., Wang, J.-W., Li, J. & Han, B. Designing future crops: challenges and strategies for sustainable agriculture. Plant J. 105, 1165–1178 (2021).
Turnbull, C., Lillemo, M. & Hvoslef-Eide, T. A. K. Global regulation of genetically modified crops amid the gene edited crop boom — a review. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 630396 (2021).
European Parliament. 2023/0226(COD) — 24/04/2024 — Plants Obtained by Certain New Genomic Techniques and Their Food and Feed www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20240202IPR17320/new-genomic-techniques-meps-back-rules-to-support-green-transition-of-farmers (2024).
Mehta, D. EU proposal on CRISPR-edited crops is welcome — but not enough. Nature 619, 437 (2023).
Vanderschuren, H., Chatukuta, P., Weigel, D. & Mehta, D. A new chance for genome editing in Europe. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1378–1380 (2023).
Related Posts
Stay Informed With the Latest & Most Important News
Previous Post
Next Post
Advertisement
