Land Dispute Emerges in Jayalalithaa Assets Case as Woman Alleges Wrongful Attachment

Speedy Summary:

• Petitioner: A 68-year-old woman, J. Kamasala from Wallajahbad in kancheepuram district,has approached the Madras High court alleging wrongful attachment of her land.
• Land Ownership: The petitioner purchased a total of 2.15 acres from Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation (TIIC) in 2006 after it repossessed and auctioned the properties belonging to a previous owner.
• Dispute Timeline:

– In 2017, interference by Madow Agro Farms led to a civil suit filed by her son; they won the case in district court in 2018.- Recently, during an request for an Encumbrance Certificate, she discovered her property was included among attached lands tied to former CM Jayalalithaa’s disproportionate assets case via a Government Order issued in connection with the case.
– Subsequent government interaction barred property transactions involving this land as February 2021.

• Writ Petition: Petitioner argues that her properties are unrelated to the assets case and claims no response from DVAC or other authorities despite sending representations on April 21, 2025.
• High Court Action: Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy issued notices to DVAC and directed filing of counter affidavits by July 28.

[Image Caption: Madras High Court | Photo Credit: K.Pichumani]

Indian Opinion Analysis:

This matter highlights challenges regarding administrative processes and property rights when government asset attachment orders intersect with private ownership claims. The petitioner’s plight reflects potential gaps in verification procedures before linking properties to high-profile legal cases like Jayalalithaa’s disproportionate assets investigation.

From India’s outlook, such disputes emphasize the need for streamlined processes ensuring that individual ownership does not inadvertently suffer due to broad legal actions against third parties’ properties-critical both for safeguarding citizen rights and maintaining public trust in institutional fairness.

should this issue be resolved favorably for petitioners like J. Kamasala based on verifiable records provided through judicial review mechanisms, this may set precedence encouraging robust checks before issuing similar directives involving private property attachments across India.

Read more