– Under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development (KIAD) Act, 1966, only KIADB has exclusive authority to regulate, approve development activities, and levy taxes within such zones.
– Gram panchayats can only gain jurisdiction over these areas through a government-issued notification under Section 37 of the KIAD Act.
The High Court ruling highlights a clear delineation of jurisdiction under industrial development laws in Karnataka. By firmly establishing KIADB’s authority over notified industrial areas, it strengthens legal protections for businesses operating in these zones. This decision could have wider implications for resolving jurisdictional disputes arising from overlapping governance structures between local authorities and specialized agencies like KIADB.
From an administrative viewpoint, this judgment underscores the need for statutory clarity and proper dialog between local governments and state-run boards. It also reinforces how protocols underlaws like the KIAD Act must be adhered to when transferring control over geographical jurisdictions. Industrial establishments may now experience greater regulatory consistency but must remain vigilant regarding compliance within their respective zones.