Kishan Reddy Criticizes Telangana Caste Survey, Supports Central Census for BCs’ Welfare

Quick Summary

• Union Minister G. Kishan reddy criticized the caste socio-economic survey conducted by the telangana Congress government, calling it “useless” and accusing it of reducing benefits for Backward Classes (BCs) by including Muslims in the BC quota.
• The Congress-led survey reportedly reduced BC depiction to 46% of the population and allotted an additional 10% quota for Muslims, who already benefit from a separate Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) category.
• mr.Reddy highlighted that the High Court had earlier struck down a 4% muslim quota under BC-E classification; however, its implementation continues due to a Supreme Court stay order. The current Telangana government plans to increase this allocation to 10%.
• He accused this move of favoring specific political entities like Majlis Party during local elections at the expense of BCs’ rights and quotas.
• At a press conference, Mr. Reddy refuted claims about PM Narendra Modi’s caste background raised sarcastically by Telangana Chief minister Revanth Reddy, explaining its inclusion in SC/ST/BC categories under past Congress governments based on Mandal Commission recommendations.
• The Minister criticized Congress for failing historically to appoint Backward Class individuals as Prime Ministers or Chief Ministers while neglecting both caste census efforts and implementation of promised quotas for genuine BC beneficiaries during their tenure.
• He called on the Telangana government to follow court directives to conduct local body polls within September with adherence to a revised 42% reservation policy benefiting true BC community members.

Indian Opinion Analysis
The debate surrounding caste-based surveys reflects broader challenges India faces in balancing social justice with effective governance amid complex identity politics. Union minister Kishan Reddy’s statement underscores concerns about equitable distribution within reservation frameworks when adjusting categories like quotas for minorities such as Muslims-potentially impacting other marginalized groups like certain Backward Classes.

The comparison between BJP proposals aligning with constitutional mandates versus criticisms levied against state-level survey practices showcases ongoing attempts in multiple political quarters to recalibrate affirmative-action systems based upon shifting electoral priorities alongside judicial scrutiny mechanisms repeatedly shaping inclusivity protocols behind key demographic breakdown policymaking clarity gaps might emerge moving respective rule-making path dependencies interconnected schematically compounding longer-term socioeconomic geostrategic regional implications unpredictably read more: https/