The presentations made by Telangana highlight enduring disputes rooted in historical reallocation during state reorganisation. By underscoring dependence on lift irrigation schemes due to denial of gravity flows-a costlier option-the counsel argued for fairer allocations under assured water categories. The issue extends not just to resource equity but also climate resilience, given the emphasis on addressing drought-prone areas and fluoride contamination.
Additionally, revisiting past decisions-like Almatti’s height proposal-points towards systemic gaps where states’ interests may have been misrepresented or overlooked historically. While pursuing its case firmly through data-driven arguments regarding project needs and dependability factors (e.g., Nagarjunasagar area reductions), Telangana stresses that equitable distribution can be achieved without undermining Andhra pradesh’s existing allocations. Such deliberations at KWDT-II could pave the way for more balanced basin-sharing agreements between riparian states.
Read More: Published – July 25, 2025