Andhra Minister: Pension Limited to Disabilities Over 40%

Quick Summary:

• Disability Pension Assurance: andhra Pradesh Minister for SERP, Kondapalli Srinivas, dismissed rumors about the discontinuation of disability pensions. Individuals with over 40% disability will continue receiving financial aid.
• Increased Financial Support: Monthly pension for the disabled has been increased from ₹3,000 to ₹6,000; those with complete disabilities are eligible for ₹15,000 in assistance.
• Reverification Initiative: The government undertook a revision of beneficiaries amid complaints of fraudulent claims in Konaseema and Kadapa districts. Over nine months, 5.55 lakh cases were verified through home visits and medical assessments.
• Finding of Fake Beneficiaries: Approximately 80,000 fake claims were identified. Manual certificates were closely scrutinized during the review process.
• Alternative Schemes Introduced: of these fake beneficiaries, over 20,000 individuals not qualifying for disability pensions are being redirected to other schemes like old-age and widow pensions starting this month.
• Government’s Stand on Eligibility Criteria: Disabilities under 40% will not qualify for pensions; however, genuine beneficiaries will continue receiving uninterrupted support.

Indian Opinion Analysis:

The government’s initiative to revise its disability pension program reflects its commitment to curbing fraud while ensuring legitimate recipients maintain access to welfare benefits. By increasing financial aid amounts significantly (₹6,000-₹15,000) alongside enforcing stricter eligibility criteria (>40% disability),Andhra Pradesh seeks an equitable approach that prioritizes resources toward those genuinely in need.

The discovery of widespread fraudulent cases-80,000 individuals using fabricated certificates-highlights systemic gaps in previous administrative processes and underscores why robust verification systems are critical for sustainable governance. Redirecting some disqualified individuals (e.g., toward widow/old-age pension schemes) exemplifies pragmatic policymaking aimed at minimizing social fallout while maintaining overall support coverage.

This action may set a precedent for other states grappling with similar welfare distribution challenges as it combines targeted resource allocation with measures against misuse-a balancing act crucial amidst rising fiscal constraints.

Read more: The Hindu