Image:
!Cryptocurrency
The concept behind requiring ‘fit and proper’ certification appears well-intentioned-aiming to instill integrity in Virtual Digital Asset Service Providers while ensuring compliance with anti-money laundering laws. however, this rule raises critical issues: handing assessment power to competitors introduces potential biases, lacks clarity due to undefined criteria for evaluation, and risks undermining fair competition.
Legal critiques indicate such vague regulatory mandates could face legal challenges if contested by affected parties as arbitrary or inhibiting market entry unfairly-especially given India’s aspirations as a global hub for blockchain technology innovation. Balancing operational security against fostering competition is crucial; industry concerns regarding cyber vulnerabilities further emphasize that regulations should prioritize robust oversight frameworks issued by government-backed entities rather than peer certification models prone to conflicts.
While these measures aim at mitigating financial crimes associated with cryptocurrencies-a notoriously complex domain-they underscore India’s urgent need for comprehensive legislation covering VDAs more comprehensively beyond patchwork solutions reliant on peer assessments.