Assam CM Justifies Evictions as Opposition Alleges Corporate Land Agenda

Speedy Summary

• On July 3, Assam authorities evicted 218 families from Lakhimpur district to reclaim 78 acres of Village Grazing Reserve (VGR) land across four locations.
• By july 8, the Sub-divisional Land Advisory Committee allotted 1.5 kathas of land (4,320 sq. ft) each to 21 evicted families, including those from the Ahom community.
• District Commissioner Pronab Jit Kakoty stated that notices were served on June 29 and the eviction process complied with legal protocols.
• Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma alleged a “demographic invasion” by Bengali-speaking Muslims occupying indigenous lands and highlighted voter roll deletion for duplicate names as part of the process.
• The Protection Acts cited include Assam Land and Revenue Regulation of 1986, Land Policy of 1989, Supreme Court decisions in favor of preserving public lands, and Assam Land Grabbing Prohibition Act of 2010.
• opposition leaders criticized eviction drives for targeting minorities and called for rehabilitation before displacement. Certain evictions were reported as benefiting corporate entities like Adani Group or Reliance Group.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The ongoing eviction drives in Assam raise concerns about balancing governance objectives with ethical implications. While authorities cite statutory mandates to protect public lands and indigenous interests under various legal frameworks, critics argue that affected communities-especially minority groups like Bengali-speaking Muslims-face disproportionate hardships without adequate provision for relocation or rehabilitation. allegations linking these evictions to corporate land acquisitions deepen apprehensions about prioritizing economic incentives over social equity.

Furthermore, claims by opposition leaders regarding political motives such as polarizing voters ahead of elections merit scrutiny but should not overshadow urgent humanitarian considerations tied to displacement outcomes. Moving forward, transparent dialog between stakeholders is essential not only for conflict resolution but also safeguarding communal harmony in one of India’s most diverse states.

Read more: Source article