Bombay HC: Appeals Against Acquittals in 2008 Malegaon Blast Case Not Open to All

Rapid Summary

• The bombay High Court is hearing an appeal filed by families of victims challenging the acquittal judgment in the 2008 Malegaon blast case.
• On September 29, 2008, a motorcycle bomb exploded near a mosque in Malegaon town, killing six people and injuring over 100 others.
• The special NIA court had acquitted seven accused, citing lack of “reliable and cogent evidence.”
• Accused include Pragya Singh Thakur (former BJP MP),Lt. Col. prasad Purohit, among others.
• Petitioners argue that the inquiry was faulty and allege improper conduct by the NIA post-case takeover.
• Petition criticizes the trial court for acting passively when prosecutorial flaws were evident.
• HC Bench questioned why family members weren’t examined as witnesses during the trial; petitioners will submit details soon.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The appeal highlights serious concerns about investigative integrity and judicial accountability in high-profile cases. Families of victims underscore their dissatisfaction with proceedings, calling out lapses in prosecutorial efforts that may have contributed to acquittals. The Bombay HC’s scrutiny on whether victims’ families were sufficiently involved as witnesses also raises questions about procedural robustness.

India’s legal system relies heavily on demonstrated proof beyond doubt; however, allegations of investigational dilution could erode public trust if inadequately addressed. This case echoes broader themes regarding institutional clarity and balance between prosecution efforts and defense rights-critical factors shaping future public perception of justice delivery systems.

Read more: The Hindu