Images: Artisan craftsmanship showcased – leather drying,polishing processes for Kolhapuris,workshop setups,display of royal replicas worn historically by Shahu Maharaj.
The case raises crucial questions about intellectual property rights enforcement related to Geographical Indications (GI). While the dismissal was based on procedural grounds regarding locus standi and not substantive merit, it underscores the need for those officially responsible-such as registered proprietors-to safeguard cultural heritage legally. For India’s artisans in sectors tied to GI protections like Kolhapuri chappals or textiles such as Benarasi silk, such incidents highlight both opportunities for showcasing craftsmanship globally yet risks surrounding cultural misappropriation.
Prada’s collection has inadvertently amplified international recognition for India’s skilled artisans but also calls attention to gaps in regulatory frameworks protecting traditional crafts from replication without consent. Strengthening mechanisms for registering ownership under GI tags could empower local communities while preserving authenticity amid globalization pressures.
Read more: Kolhapuri Chappal Artisans’ Spotlight