– Exclusion of certain owners from rent eligibility during the demolition-reconstruction phase,especially those renting out their flats or who hadn’t commenced residence.
– Lack of compensation for investment in furnishing apartment interiors.
The decision to go on appeal signals discontent among Chander Kunj residents over provisions associated with forced eviction and reconstruction. Core concerns like financial losses due to rent restrictions and uncompensated interior investments highlight valid issues faced by affected homeowners.
While the court has clarified aspects regarding rent eligibility criteria, gaps persist-impacting those reliant on rental income for loan repayments. Furthermore,judicial silence on furnishings might hinder rehabilitation efforts unless further clarity emerges during appeals.
The phased timeline ensures structural integrity post-demolition but extends considerable inconvenience till project completion in late 2029-raising questions about whether prolonged displacement could be mitigated through alternate arrangements or improved policy frameworks tailored specifically for residents affected by such urban restructuring projects.For more details Click Here