CPI Accuses BJP of Undermining Democracy to Push Theocracy

Rapid Summary:

• CPI national secretariat member Amarjeet Kaur criticized BJP and RSS ideologies, labeling them divisive and fascist.
• She accused the modi-lead BJP government of attempting to replace India’s democratic republic with a theocratic state and undermining federalism through systematic changes without altering the Constitution formally.
• Ms. Kaur expressed concern over alleged misuse of constitutional posts such as Governors and criticized the appointment process for Election Commissioners at the Centre.
• She claimed efforts were being made by BJP-RSS combine to homogenize Indian society under “Hindutva,” disregarding India’s diverse heritage rooted in Hinduism, sufism, and Indus Valley traditions.
• Ms. Kaur raised issues regarding amendments to labor laws brought indirectly by asking States to align existing laws with new codes.
• The CPI will address all these issues during its 25th Congress in Chandigarh from September 21-25, 2025.
• CPI plans to push for fast-track courts in murder cases like those of journalist Gauri Lankesh, scholar MM Kalburgi, rationalist Narendra Dabholkar, and leader Govind Pansare, citing a common link between these killings.

Indian Opinion Analysis:
Amarjeet Kaur’s criticism underscores ongoing debates about federal authority versus State autonomy within India’s political framework under the Modi-led government.Her remarks on appointments for constitutional posts reflect wider concerns about transparency and impartiality that have surfaced in recent public discourse surrounding governance practices at both Union and State levels.Claims regarding attempts at cultural homogenization invoke broader questions about religious inclusivity vis-à-vis national identity-a challenge India continually navigates as a diverse democracy.

The discussion around labor law amendments signals potential friction between economic reforms sought by centralized governance models versus long-standing priorities tailored to regional needs-a topic likely critical during upcoming legislative sessions or elections.

Lastly, Ms. Kaur’s insistence on fast-track justice for cases like Gauri Lankesh’s points toward unresolved tensions surrounding freedom of expression versus ideological extremism-the outcome hear could impact public trust in law enforcement processes significantly.Read More