The critique by Piyush Goyal highlights an existing divergence between India’s strengths in consumer-driven technology and ambitions for deep tech innovation.While comparisons with mature ecosystems such as those of China or the US highlight gaps, they risk overlooking the unique trajectory of india’s economic development-a process still prioritizing baseline infrastructural needs for a developing nation.
Indian VCs’ preference for short-term growth sectors reflects practical challenges tied to returns timing rather than lack of vision alone; however, addressing domestic institutional funding barriers might play a pivotal role in structural change over time. The low percentage allocated to R&D underscores systemic issues that require government attention if India aims to compete globally in high-research domains like AI.
Given India’s talent base-including top-tier graduates from IITs-the potential exists for significant breakthroughs once stronger links between academia, VC pipelines, and policy support are established. Without these efforts focusing on both structural reforms and incentivizing risk capital toward research-heavy ventures may limit scalability into globally competitive industries.