# Delhi HC dismisses plea to bring Rajiv Gandhi Foundation under RTI

2026-08-18T01:21:34+00:00 | Governance | Indian Opinion Desk

Corroboration: 1 independent outlet

The Delhi High Court on Monday dismissed a 2011 plea seeking to declare the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation a public authority under the Right to Information Act. Justice Swarana Kanta threw out the petition after noting the petitioner, Delhi-based lawyer Shanmuga Patro, had not appeared on several dates. Patro had challenged a 2010 order of the Chief Information Commission, which had rejected his plea stating the foundation was not a public authority. He argued the foundation received government funds and carried out large-scale public activities, making it a public authority. The court had earlier asked the foundation to file its audited accounts from inception till 2010-2011 to help decide the matter. The foundation's counsel said it was not set up through a government notification and had received only four per cent government funding, which was 'insignificant' compared with its overall budget. With the dismissal, the CIC's 2010 finding that the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation is not a public authority under the RTI Act stands.

## Coverage

- indiatoday.in <https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/rajiv-gandhi-foundation-rti-case-delhi-hc-dismisses-plea-on-public-authority-status-ptag-2973328-2026-08-17?utm_source=rss>

This story was synthesised by AI from the source linked above.

Tags: Delhi High Court, Rajiv Gandhi Foundation, RTI, Shanmuga Patro
Canonical: https://indianopinion.org/delhi-hc-dismisses-plea-to-bring-rajiv-gandhi-foundation-under-rti/
License: Summary and commentary (c) Indian Opinion, reusable with attribution. Facts belong to the linked sources.
Cite: https://indianopinion.org/delhi-hc-dismisses-plea-to-bring-rajiv-gandhi-foundation-under-rti/#story-in-brief

Review state: restored archive article, accurate at time of publication, not offered to search indexes.

How this brief was made: an AI model read the report linked above and wrote this summary and analysis, which were published automatically. Published briefs are sampled every hour by an automated quality check; the editor verifies its findings and approves corrections, and corrected briefs carry a dated correction line. We do no original reporting. Methodology: https://indianopinion.org/ai-use-policy/
