Delhi HC Reserves Verdict on MP Engineer Rashid’s Security Expense Plea

IO_AdminAfrica7 hours ago4 Views

Swift Summary

  • The Delhi High Court reserved its order on J&K MP Sheikh Abdul Rashid’s plea regarding a ₹4 lakh deposit required for travel expenses too attend Parliament sessions while in custody.
  • MP Sheikh abdul Rashid, popularly known as Engineer Rashid, has been in Delhi’s Tihar Jail since 2019 and is facing trial in a terror funding case.
  • Charges against him include criminal conspiracy, sedition, waging war against the government (IPC), and offenses under UAPA related to terrorist acts and funding.
  • The National Examination Agency (NIA) arrested him in 2017; chargesheets were filed in October 2019, with formal charges framed by March 2022.
  • It was revealed that Mr. Rashid has incurred ₹17 lakh so far for travel to attend Parliamentary sessions during his detention.
  • His lawyer argued before the court that salary costs of accompanying police officials shoudl not be included under travel expenses as per Delhi Prison Rules but expressed willingness to pay reasonable costs like meals for officials.
  • Justice Bhambhani remarked that as Mr. Rashid remains under custody when traveling, the costs should be borne by jail authorities rather than himself.

Indian Opinion Analysis
The ongoing case involving Lok Sabha MP Sheikh Abdul Rashid raises pertinent issues about balancing legal accountability with facilitating democratic engagement by incarcerated public representatives. While it is vital that financial accountability mechanisms are firmly upheld, tying exorbitant personal financial burdens such as ₹17 lakh onto an individual already detained raises questions about equity and precedent-setting for other lawmakers similarly placed under judicial scrutiny.

Additionally, this debate accentuates broader concerns surrounding India’s approach toward detentions tied to terror-related accusations-a sensitive subject notably involving regions like Jammu & kashmir. As this unfolds within India’s legal process framework, transparency from authorities and adherence to procedural fairness will be essential not onyl for maintaining credibility but also preventing any undue politicization around such cases while protecting institutional integrity.Read more: link

0 Votes: 0 Upvotes, 0 Downvotes (0 Points)

Leave a reply

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Stay Informed With the Latest & Most Important News

I consent to receive newsletter via email. For further information, please review our Privacy Policy

Advertisement

Loading Next Post...
Follow
Sign In/Sign Up Sidebar Search Trending 0 Cart
Popular Now
Loading

Signing-in 3 seconds...

Signing-up 3 seconds...

Cart
Cart updating

ShopYour cart is currently is empty. You could visit our shop and start shopping.