ED Conducts Raids in ₹350-Crore Hythro Power Bank Fraud Case

Swift Summary

• The Enforcement Directorate (ED) conducted searches at multiple locations in Delhi, Chennai, and Bengaluru in connection to the alleged ₹350-crore bank fraud case involving Hythro Power and Controls Ltd. (HPCL).
• Five premises were searched around Delhi, three in Chennai, and one in Bengaluru.
• The case stems from a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) First Information report against HPCL and it’s promoters,Amul Gabrani and Ajay Kumar Bishnoi.
• Allegations include meaningful diversion of funds through related entities of HPCL by its directors/promoters resulting in losses to banks totaling ₹346.08 crore:

– Punjab National Bank: ₹168.07 crore
– ICICI Bank: ₹77.81 crore
– Kotak Mahindra Bank: ₹44.49 crore
– Union bank: ₹55.71 crore

• this misconduct reportedly occurred between 2009 and 2015; the loan account became a non-performing Asset on March 31, 2015, before being declared as “fraud” to the Reserve Bank of India on June 13, 2024.
• A forensic audit revealed fraudulent activities including fictitious job work transactions with entities like Avadh Transformers Pvt. Ltd.,G.E.T power Pvt Ltd., Revolution Infocom Pvt Ltd., Tecpro engg Pvt Ltd.
• ED claims these actions caused significant financial erosion impacting creditor interests.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The bank fraud linked to Hythro Power and Controls Ltd highlights critical concerns for India’s financial ecosystem-namely corporate governance challenges within industries reliant on large credit facilities like power transmission projects where operations are highly capital-intensive but vulnerable to mismanagement or malfeasance.

Actions taken by investigative agencies such as the CBI and ED underline institutional rigor surrounding India’s banking regulations when dealing with large-scale defaults or potential corruption that undermines trust in financial systems. However, cases like this drive home how better surveillance mechanisms must be prioritized for timely detection rather than retrospective investigations after considerable losses have already occurred.

From an economic perspective-given that such fraud is declared years after actual default-it signals gaps between restructuring efforts for struggling enterprises versus systemic prevention strategies against fund diversion tactics exploiting group companies via complex circular transactions frameworks highlighted here post forensic outcomes revealed respective lapses.

Read More