Ex-HC Judge Nirmal Yadav Acquitted in 2008 Cash-at-Door Case

Quick Summary

• A special CBI court acquitted former Punjab and Haryana High Court judge Justice (Retd) Nirmal Yadav and four others in a case involving Rs 15 lakh allegedly intended as a bribe for her.
• The scandal started in august 2008 when the cash was reportedly delivered to another judge, Justice Nirmaljit Kaur, triggering investigations.
• One of the accused, Sanjiv bansal, died during the trial period in February 2017.
• The case was initially registered by Chandigarh Police but transferred to CBI. Prosecution sanctions were approved by both the Punjab and Haryana High Court Chief Justice and the President of India in 2011.
• Charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act were framed against Justice Yadav in January 2014. During the trial, over 69 witnesses out of 84 listed gave testimony over a period spanning nearly two decades.
• Defense counsel claimed false allegations against Justice Yadav. A detailed order is awaited.

!Former Punjab and Haryana High Court judge Nirmal Yadav

Read More

Indian Opinion Analysis

The acquittal of justice (Retd) Nirmal Yadav underscores how allegations within India’s judiciary can create prolonged legal battles before final resolutions are achieved. This case highlights systemic delays where trials can stretch across years due to numerous procedural hurdles, witness testimonies, appeals processes, and institutional oversight responsibilities.

From an institutional trust viewpoint, such cases put scrutiny on mechanisms ensuring judicial accountability alongside fairness for those accused-especially when high-ranking individuals are involved.While clarity through investigation frameworks like those employed by CBI plays a crucial role here, long delays may reduce public confidence in resolving politically sensitive or high-profile cases effectively.

Moreover, issues surrounding alleged corruption within judicial systems emphasize ongoing concerns about ethics governance within key institutions that must remain impartial arbiters of law-a matter demanding vigilance from civil society and watchdog agencies alike.

Read More