Now Reading: Ex-MP Vinod Kumar Accuses Ghose Panel of Violating CoI Act, Denying KCR Fair Hearing
1
-
01
Ex-MP Vinod Kumar Accuses Ghose Panel of Violating CoI Act, Denying KCR Fair Hearing
Quick Summary
- Senior BRS leader and former MP G. Vinod Kumar criticized the PC Ghose Commission for blaming former Chief Minister K. Chandrasekhar rao (KCR) for irregularities in the execution of the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project (KLIP).
- Kumar stated that KCR and Cabinet members were not given an prospect to present arguments before the Commission, despite Section 8C of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 allowing cross-examination rights and representation by legal practitioners.
- the Commission had observed that Medigadda barrage was constructed contrary to advice from an Expert Committee formed in January 2015.Kumar responded that compensatory decisions led to constructing Annaram and Sundilla upstream barrages across Godavari River as part of KLIP’s water management strategy.
Indian opinion analysis
The criticisms raised by G. Vinod Kumar highlight concerns over procedural fairness in governmental investigations like those conducted by inquiry commissions under Indian law. If key individuals are denied opportunities for representation or cross-examination, it undermines trust in institutional processes meant to ensure accountability. Furthermore, disputes over technical decisions such as those related to KLIP illustrate challenges faced when balancing expert guidance with evolving project needs on infrastructure initiatives critical for India’s water security and agricultural livelihoods.
While it is importent for commissions to rigorously examine public projects, procedural transparency ensures fair evaluation without undue politicization or blame shifting-a crucial safeguard considering KLIP’s meaning as one of India’s largest irrigation undertakings linked directly to enduring progress goals.Read more:
Donations
Advertisement
Loading Next Post...
Popular Now
Scroll to Top
