Rapid Summary
Image: Representation purposes only | Photo Credit: RAO GN
Indian Opinion Analysis
This case highlights ongoing complexities in addressing online speech within India’s legal framework. While freedom of expression is constitutionally guaranteed, posts disrespectful to national figures like Mahatma Gandhi can raise questions of permissible limits under public order laws. Charging under Section 66(C) underscores stricter enforcement against impersonation or misuse of digital identities whereas invoking societal disruption suggests concern over virality impacting harmony.
Government monitoring cell interventions suggest an increasing focus on regulating narratives that distort ancient truth or promote divisiveness online. while such measures aim to safeguard national cohesion, they must balance rigor with adherence to democratic principles protecting free speech-one area where implementation practices often receive scrutiny.
To read more: The Hindu