HC Strikes Down Discriminatory Rent Criteria for Army Towers During Displacement

Quick Summary

• Kerala High Court struck down a provision excluding non-residential owners of apartments at Chander Kunj Army towers in Kochi from receiving monthly rent during displacement.
• The Division Bench noted that defense personnel may intend to occupy these apartments upon retirement or may be paying EMIs on loans, making them entitled to rent based on document submissions.
• Claims by certain apartment owners were deemed maintainable despite prior approaches to statutory authorities like the Real Estate Regulatory authority.
• The court refrained from adjudicating monetary damages due to lack of evidence presented in the writ petition.
• Suggestions for constructing additional floors for income generation were dismissed; AWHO affirmed it had no such plans.
• Reconstruction expenses, initially budgeted at ₹175 crore, were revised to ₹211 crore; AWHO must fully bear costs without burdening owners for reconstruction approvals filing.
• Occupancy certificates will remain suspended until reoccupation is completed, preventing needless municipal taxes for apartment owners.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The Kerala High Court’s decision reflects a balanced approach toward protecting the rights of displaced apartment owners while recognizing real-world scenarios such as defence personnel allotments and financial commitments like EMIs. It underscores clarity and accountability in housing projects managed by organizations such as AWHO while safeguarding procedural equity among all property stakeholders.

By holding reconstruction obligation solely with the developer (AWHO), the judgment ensures developers cannot shift administrative or financial obligations onto homeowners already facing displacement challenges. Moreover,rejecting claims of monetizing additional construction space prevents potential misuse and maintains focus on ethical project management.

For homeowners unable to utilize their residences due to ongoing legal discourse and construction delays, this ruling offers relief through clarified entitlements like rental compensation during temporary displacement, fostering fairness in addressing grievances tied to large-scale residential projects.

Read more: Source