# Hikaru Nakamura apologises after blaming Chess.com for EWC chaos

2026-08-15T19:42:15+00:00 | Sports | Indian Opinion Desk

Corroboration: 2 independent outlets

Hikaru Nakamura has apologised for blaming Chess.com after a technical glitch disrupted his third-place match at the Esports World Cup. The American grandmaster had wrongly assumed the platform caused the problem, but later admitted it was an 'EWC issue' that affected several events, not just chess. Nakamura was leading Alireza Firouzja 3-1 when both screens went blank. After a 20-minute wait, the frustrated Firouzja left the arena. Officials awarded Nakamura the match by forfeit. In interviews, Nakamura criticised Chess.com, but says he 'jumped to conclusions' after not being given full information. Nakamura finished third, earning $145,000 and Club Championship points for Falcons Esports. He has asked for his retraction to be shared wherever his original comments appeared. Magnus Carlsen won the overall title, defeating Denis Lazavik in the final.

## Coverage

- timesofindia.indiatimes.com <https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/chess/i-now-know-i-was-wrong-hikaru-nakamura-breaks-silence-after-chaotic-ewc-match-against-alireza-firouzja/articleshow/133265883.cms>
- hindustantimes.com <https://www.hindustantimes.com/sports/others/frustrated-alireza-firouzja-leaves-arena-hikaru-nakamura-says-sorry-what-caused-chaos-at-ewc-3rd-place-chess-match-101786816556452.html>

This story was synthesised by AI from the 2 sources linked above.

Tags: Alireza Firouzja, Chess.com, Esports World Cup, Hikaru Nakamura
Canonical: https://indianopinion.org/hikaru-nakamura-apologises-after-blaming-chess-com-for-ewc-chaos/
License: Summary and commentary (c) Indian Opinion, reusable with attribution. Facts belong to the linked sources.
Cite: https://indianopinion.org/hikaru-nakamura-apologises-after-blaming-chess-com-for-ewc-chaos/#story-in-brief

How this brief was made: an AI model read the reports linked above and wrote this summary and analysis, which were published automatically. Published briefs are sampled every hour by an automated quality check; the editor verifies its findings and approves corrections, and corrected briefs carry a dated correction line. Stance labels are editorial classifications of how each outlet framed this story, assigned by the same model, not ratings of the outlets. We do no original reporting. Methodology: https://indianopinion.org/ai-use-policy/