The National Gallery of Art and the Smithsonian’s Natural History Museum have been next-door neighbors in Washington, DC for nearly 90 years—but until now, they’ve never shared so much as a cup of coffee across the fence.
That all changes this summer, as the two institutions collaborate to create a cross-pollinated art and natural science exhibition featuring selections from the art gallery’s centuries-old paintings of birds, bugs, and exotic critters … along with actual examples of those creatures drawn from the Smithsonian’s enormous collection of animal artifacts.
The exhibit, called “Little Beasts: Art, Wonder, and the Natural World,” focuses on a period beginning in the 1500s when artists in Northern Europe—inspired largely by strange specimens that had found their way to Antwerp, Belgium, aboard merchant sailing ships—were creating exquisitely detailed, and unprecedentedly accurate, images of creatures from the smallest insects to the largest mammals.
One display case features the Smithsonian’s own specimen of a Central American elephant beetle, the size of a baby’s fist but armored and horned in a most terrifying (if harmless) manner. Next to it is mounted Flemish painter Jacob Hoefnagel’s 1592 painting of the same species, meticulously rendered with brushes that at times consisted of a single hair bristle.
An insect tableau created for the National Gallery of Art exhibition Little Beasts by the Department of Entomology at the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History with specimens from the collection.
Photograph by James Di Loreto, Smithsonian Institution
Jan van Kessel the Elder. Insects and a Sprig of Rosemary, 1653 oil on copper.
Photograph courtesy of National Gallery of Art, The Richard C. Von Hess Foundation, Nell and Robert Weidenhammer Fund, Barry D. Friedman, and Friends of Dutch Art
Nearby is 17th-century Czech artist Wencenslaus Hollar’s etching of a Tasmanian vasum ceramicum shell, impossibly spindly and surreally suspended in midair, joined by a spectacular real-life specimen from the Smithsonian’s vast shell collection.
And there is Hoefnagel’s life-sized painting of a Southern Hawker dragonfly, highlighted with gold paint, seemingly ready to fly off its parchment page—accompanied by a real dragonfly, temporarily freed from its drawer in the Smithsonian’s climate-controlled archives. (Recent studies have revealed that Hoefnagel, obsessed with accuracy, sometimes fastened actual dragonfly wings to his paintings.)
These and the rest of the exhibition’s works embrace a historic moment when artists—many wielding magnifying glasses—became obsessed with capturing nature in all its detail. Throughout three exhibition halls, the juxtaposition of art and artifacts reveals the astonishing amount of research and detail represented in each work.
Jacob Hoefnagel. Part 1, Plate 1, from the series Archetypa studiaque (Archetypes and Studies), 1592
Photograph courtesy of National Museum of Natural History, Rosenwald Collection
An Elephant Beetle (Megasoma e. elephas) from the Department of Entomology collections at the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History.
Photograph by James Di Loreto and Phillip R. Lee, Smithsonian Institution
While it holds a prestigious spot on the National Mall, the National Gallery is not part of the Smithsonian—and the collaboration is novel for both institutions.
“We came up with the idea for this during the pandemic,” says Alexandra Libby, a curator of Northern Paintings for the museum. “We started trading e-mails, hoping to get the Smithsonian people excited about it, explaining that these are not just pretty pictures of butterflies, but evidence that there was a real scientific level of engagement during this period.
“They were engaged from the start. They said, ‘This is amazing!’”
Moving from gallery to gallery, a visitor to this joint venture exhibition walks through a period when artists took the lead in creating the concept of natural history, says Brooks Rich, a curator of Old Master art at the National Gallery.
“The flourishing of interest in nature in its most minute detail that we see here really provided the foundation for the entire discipline,” he says.
That breakthrough is crystalized in a display case positioned at the center of the exhibition’s first room: Four diary-sized books, bound in leather, illustrated by the artist Hoefnagel. Entitled Aier, Aqua, Ignis and Terra (Air, Water, Fire, and Earth), the books contain, on fine parchment paper, 270 hand-painted images of creatures ranging from house flies to elephants with a level of detail that rivals anything a 4K TV screen will reproduce today.
Collection of animal skeleton etchings on laid paper by Teodoro Filippo di Liagno
Photograph by Rob Shelley, National Gallery of Art
“Prior to Hoefnagel, most people dismissed insects as vermin,” says Stacy Sell, the museum’s curator of Northern Book Painting. “But he undertook a sustained study of them, looking at every minute detail, and saw how beautiful they were.
“Finally, he said, ‘You know, watercolor just isn’t going to cut it.’ So, he developed all kinds of innovative techniques to create a level of detail no one had attempted before.
“I mean, he actually painted with butterfly dust. That’s pretty amazing.”
So delicate are the images in the four books, the museum almost never has them on display. In the course of the exhibition—May through November 2—the pages will be turned just three times.
Perhaps the most glorious art work in the exhibition is the epic “Noah’s Family Assembling the Animals Before the Ark,” painted around 1660 by the Flemish artist Jan van Kessell the Elder. The Noahs—dressed in their Flemish finest—herd a zoofull of animals across a distinctively Northern European landscape toward a distant, barely-visible boat. Camels, turtles, monkeys, ostriches—even North American turkeys—ramble across the frame. But it’s the sky that commands our attention: A riot of birds, two-by-two, winging their way to safety.
“It was such a joy to work with the Natural History Museum managers as they identified all the birds in this painting,” says Libby. “They studied it to see what the artist got right, and why they might have gotten some things wrong.”
For example, at the painting’s extreme upper right, a pair of Paradisaea apoda—Greater Birds of Paradise, from New Guinea—streak into the image like plumed missiles. Besides their glorious color, their most distinctive feature is the fact that they have no legs.
“These birds were prized for their feathers, for women’s hats,” says Libby. “By the time those dead birds arrived in Europe, their legs were gone.”
For a painter obsessed with getting everything just right, only one solution could satisfy both art and science: Rather than get the legs wrong, van Kessell simply left them out.