# IGNOU students flag pending assignment marks, project results 2026-10-18T06:11:09+00:00 | Governance | Indian Opinion Desk Corroboration: 1 independent outlet Students of Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) have reported delays in the updation of assignment marks and project results, with one student saying he emailed the university 15 times without a response. In posts on X on 16 and 17 October, students tagged IGNOU and its regional centres. Subramanyam Paipuri said his June 2026 result showed only one subject pending but the examination form deadline had passed, and he asked for the late fee of Rs 1,100 to be waived. Another student, Enaya, said assignment marks submitted in March had not been updated. Rashmi Rekha Sundaray, a Diploma in Early Childhood Care and Education (DECE) student in the January 2025 batch, said her project result was pending despite timely submission and repeated emails. The university's response to the complaints could not be established from the posts. ## Indian Opinion Analysis The posts show individual grievances that, if unresolved, could affect students' academic progress and eligibility for further studies. Incomplete records may delay admissions that require verified grade cards. The students have followed official channels, email and social media tags, but received no response. The university's next step, if any, was not stated in the posts, affected students may need to escalate to regional centres with proof of submission. ## Coverage - timesnownews.com Straight reporting of student posts, no stance or editorialising. This brief was synthesised by AI from the source linked above. Tags: IGNOU, Rashmi Rekha Sundaray, Subramanyam Paipuri Canonical: https://indianopinion.org/ignou-students-flag-pending-assignment-marks-project-results/ License: Summary and commentary (c) Indian Opinion, reusable with attribution. Facts belong to the linked sources. Cite: https://indianopinion.org/ignou-students-flag-pending-assignment-marks-project-results/#story-in-brief How this brief was made: an AI model read the report linked above and wrote this summary and analysis, which were published automatically. Published briefs are sampled every hour by an automated quality check; the editor verifies its findings and approves corrections, and corrected briefs carry a dated correction line. We do no original reporting. Methodology: https://indianopinion.org/ai-use-policy/