– Past failures to secure key technology transfers due to weaker buyer leverage compared to countries like South Korea.
– Political risks tied to import dependence amid international sanctions and transactional negotiations by OEMs.- Issues such as quality assurance, deadlocked negotiations, and minor technical hurdles have previously stalled projects.
The resumption of the multi-role fighter procurement after seven years marks a notable moment for India’s defense strategy,emphasizing self-reliance through indigenous manufacturing. Such long delays highlight institutional sluggishness that may hinder timely security measures-a critical concern given global geopolitical dynamics. While this initiative integrates private players into aerospace growth under ‘Make in India,’ its success depends largely on execution: effective technology transfer agreements with OEMs and sustained government support for domestic manufacturers.
From an industrial outlook, this project can catalyze India’s private aerospace ambitions if fostered with patience over sequential technological milestones rather than unattainable near-term outcomes.Strategic alignment between national security interests and nurturing domestic capabilities speaks directly to reducing dependency on imports amidst vulnerabilities like international sanctions.
Executing this vision requires pragmatism-compromising where necessary without forfeiting core objectives-to avoid repeating past negotiation pitfalls while enabling growth toward cutting-edge indigenized solutions over time. Success would not only serve security imperatives but also position India competitively in global aerospace markets across future generations of combat assets.