– Ismail Thayyil, a dairy farmer from Mankada, purchased a high-breed cow for ₹70,000 that produced 23 litres of milk daily.
– The cow passed away within two weeks due to illness.
– A veterinarian provided a post-mortem report and photo of the deceased cow to the insurance company, but the claim was rejected citing unclear visibility of the ear tag in the photograph.
– Despite clarification from the veterinarian, Ismail’s claim remained denied.
– The Commission criticized the insurer’s delay and lapse in handling claims.
– Ordered payment: ₹70,000 insured amount + ₹50,000 compensation + ₹10,000 legal expenses (₹1.3 lakh in total).
– Additional penalty: 9% interest if overdue beyond one month.
The ruling underscores systemic issues surrounding consumer redressal processes and accountability within India’s insurance sector. Farmers like Mr. Ismail thrive under uncertain conditions; timely payouts from insurance are pivotal when facing livestock losses that directly impact income streams.
The case illustrates how technical disputes can disadvantage policyholders during vulnerable times-a recurring concern in rural sectors reliant on agricultural or livestock-based assets amid climate risks and health issues affecting animals.The commission’s judgment sends an critically important signal promoting fairness while highlighting areas for improvement such as clearer frameworks on photo identification procedures or dispute-resolution timeframes by insurers. Ensuring trust between insurers and farmers is vital as it reinforces financial inclusion goals critical to India’s agrarian economy.
Read More: [Link not included as per input structure]