Quick Summary
- teh Karnataka High Court has issued notices to the state government and the Karnataka Examinations Authority (KEA) in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL).
- the PIL, filed by Akhila Karnataka Brahmana Mahasabha, alleges that CET exam centres in Bidar, Shivamogga, and dharwad districts forced candidates to remove their “Janivara” or “Janeu” (sacred threads) during examinations held on April 17.
- Senior advocate S Sriranga informed the court that students who refused were barred from entering exam halls, leading to calls for re-examination of affected candidates.
- The petitioner accused KEA officials of violating constitutional rights under Articles 21A (right to education), 25 (freedom of religion), and 29(2) (non-discrimination in educational institutions).
- An FIR was registered after the PIL was filed.The petitioner requested clear guidelines for exam conduct and frisking procedures by KEA.
- The high court is scheduled to hear this matter again on June 9.
!HC notice to Karnataka govt over forced removal of sacred thread
Read More
Indian opinion Analysis
The PIL raises an crucial question about balancing religious freedoms with standardized examination security protocols. Forcing candidates to remove sacred threads could be seen as infringing Articles 25’s guarantee of religious freedom while barring entry affects Article 21A’s promises regarding education access. At a foundational level, such actions highlight potential inconsistencies in policy enforcement at examination centres.
The demand for clearer guidelines governing frisking procedures by KEA officials is logical as it seeks procedural consistency across centres without compromising constitutional rights or creating undue obstacles for examinees. This case may set an important precedent on harmonizing operational rules with cultural sensitivities in India’s multicultural context. Additionally, ensuring sensitivity training for staff involved could mitigate similar incidents moving forward.