Fast Summary
- the Kerala High Court has affirmed its ability to consider anticipatory bail pleas directly, even if litigants bypass the Sessions Court.
- This observation was made during an anticipatory bail plea of an IT firm owner accused of sexually assaulting a woman employee.
- The Supreme Court previously issued a notice warning that direct approaches to High Courts for pre-arrest bail could lead to an overflow of applications and undermine the hierarchical structure of courts under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
- The High Court referred to legal precedents supporting its stance but acknowledged it must decide cases on merit if entertained before Supreme Court observations.
Indian Opinion Analysis
the Kerala High Court’s decision reflects ongoing legal tension over jurisdictional hierarchy in India’s judicial system. While the apex court emphasized respect for procedural norms by directing litigants to approach Sessions Courts first, the High Court upheld freedom for parties to choose forums based on existing precedents.This balancing act stresses individual access against procedural efficiency-a critical issue as courts grapple with case backlogs nationwide. Observations by both courts may prompt discussions about standardizing procedures under BNSS, highlighting broader implications for judicial reform in india.
Read more: Indian Opinion Source