The debate over school closure statistics signals larger concerns about data reliability and collaboration between State and Union governments. while federal databases like UDISE provide standardized figures for national policy analysis, states like Kerala rely on more localized systems such as Sampoorna, which are claimed to be more accurate due to frequent updates. These discrepancies highlight inefficiencies in integrating state-specific datasets with central frameworks.
Additionally, phasing out MGLCs reflects adherence to evolving educational norms following legislative reforms like the Right to Education Act but may contribute misleadingly to “school closure” figures if not correctly classified or communicated.
For policymakers and citizens alike, this situation underscores how clarity in definitions-like what constitutes a “closed” school-is essential for productive dialog around education reform. Improved synergy between local systems like Sampoorna and central platforms like UDISE could help mitigate public confusion while enhancing accountability across governance levels.
Read More: [source link not available]