Kerala Urges Supreme Court to Drop Case Against Governor

Rapid summary

• Event: Supreme Court questions Centre’s objection to Kerala withdrawing petitions challenging the Governor’s delay in approving State Bills.
• kerala’s stance: The petitions were withdrawn as they became infructuous following an April 8 Supreme Court judgment in the Tamil Nadu Governor case,which mandated a three-month deadline for Governors and Presidents to act on pending Bills.
• Centre’s request: Attorney General R.Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta requested that Kerala’s petitions remain pending until a Presidential Reference seeking clarification on the Tamil Nadu judgment is resolved by a larger bench.
• court remarks: Justice P.S. Narasimha affirmed that States have the right to withdraw their petitions.
• Kerala’s argument via Senior Advocate K.K.Venugopal:

– Surprise expressed at Centre’s objections.
– Called the Presidential Reference “infructuous” due to earlier court judgments on similar issues concerning delays by other Governors (e.g., Punjab).

• The case has been scheduled for further hearing within two weeks.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The central issue revolves around governance delays caused by State Governors regarding crucial State Bills and subsequent court rulings aimed at addressing these issues systematically. The matter highlights recurring tensions between State governments and appointed officials such as Governors, raising broader concerns about federalism dynamics in India. Kerala’s withdrawal of its petition reflects acknowledgment of existing legal precedents from past judgments; though, the Centre’s objection signals ongoing scrutiny over how previous apex court decisions might set binding timelines for constitutional authorities.

the outcome of this dispute may shape clearer operational protocols governing these interactions, especially if a larger Bench reviews the Presidential Reference further clarifying or refining recent decisions like those impacting Tamil Nadu or Punjab cases.It also underscores how procedural delays can impact legislative efficacy at both state and national levels.

Read more here: link