– Demanded a White Paper on investments secured during DMK’s tenure.
– Argued industrial growth in southern Tamil Nadu was largely driven by Union government infrastructure projects (Thoothukudi airport, port upgrades, national highways, railway projects).
– Alleged the TN government is misrepresenting Union-led projects as its own achievements.
– Chief Minister M.K. Stalin signed multiple MoUs in five countries (Dubai: 6; U.S.: 19; Spain: 3; Singapore: 6; Japan: 6).
– No updates have been provided regarding outcomes or implementation of these MoUs.
– TN’s industrial prominence predates DMK governance.
– Success attributed to India’s Central economic policies and skilled workforce.
The demand for a White Paper reflects concerns over transparency surrounding investment claims made by the Tamil Nadu government under DMK leadership. If substantiated, Mr. Murugan’s critique raises key questions about accountability in delivering promised economic outcomes stemming from global MoUs and investors’ summits led by Chief Minister Stalin.
Infrastructure development attributed to Central-backed initiatives points to overlapping contributions between state and central authorities-a recurrent dynamic across Indian governance that often fosters political debates rather than cooperative progress tracking systems.
Tamil Nadu’s manufacturing reputation remains an established asset but clarity on how future policy alignments between state and center could drive similar returns might be crucial for assessing long-term industrial strategy beyond political narratives or competing credit claims.
Read More: The Hindu Article