Quick Summary:
- The Bombay High Court issued notices too seven persons acquitted in the 2008 Malegaon blast case following an appeal by victims’ family members.
- Notices were also served to the National Investigation agency (NIA) and Maharashtra government, wiht a hearing scheduled for six weeks later.
- the appeal challenges the July 31, 2025 judgment of the special NIA court that acquitted all accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and others.
- Petitioners argue that faulty investigation should not lead to acquittal, citing legal provisions defining “victim” rights under Section 2 of BNSS and Supreme Court precedents.
- The High Court emphasized petitions must clarify roles of appellants tied to deceased victims; incomplete details caused adjournments earlier this week.
- Special NIA court had previously ruled suspicion does not equate proof and highlighted investigation gaps before acquitting all.
Indian Opinion Analysis:
The Bombay High Court’s notice signals continued scrutiny over judicial interpretations in high-profile cases like Malegaon. While upholding procedural integrity, it raises unresolved questions about balancing victim representation with due process for defendants. Legal reliance on Section 2 BNSS illustrates evolving definitions of “victim” as its amendment yet faces hurdles given specific code applicability limitations here. Overall implications could be profound for india’s anti-terror jurisprudence-either affirming investigative accountability or reinforcing protections against presumption-based convictions.
Read more at: the Hindu