– Article 174(1) of the Indian Constitution mandates that no more than six months should elapse between two sittings of a Legislative Assembly.
– The last sitting of the Assembly was held on August 12, 2024; so, a mandatory session should have been held by February 11.
– Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla’s decision to declare null and void an earlier January summons for a February session circumvented this timeline.
– Presented by a four-member delegation at Imphal’s raj Bhavan, citing potential constitutional breaches due to suspension or failure to convene legislative sessions as required under Article 174(1).- Questioned whether the Assembly is “alive,” “dead,” or dissolved after February’s lapsing deadline.
– Raised concerns over gubernatorial actions potentially violating constitutional provisions.
Link for read more: The Hindu
The Congress party’s memorandum raises basic constitutional questions regarding governance during crises such as President’s Rule. The lapse in convening legislative sessions within prescribed timelines under Article 174(1) may pose serious ramifications for democratic accountability in Manipur. Whether procedural decisions effectively suspend key institutional functions demonstrates how emergencies can test legal safeguards.
From an administrative standpoint, Governor bhalla is expected to address these constitutionally complex concerns promptly to avoid ambiguity surrounding institutional continuity.Resolving such ambiguity ensures compliance with parliamentary norms and prevents precedents that might undermine democratic institutions elsewhere.
The broader significance lies in maintaining trust in constitutional mechanisms amidst ethno-political turbulence-a critical factor for societal stability and governance efficiency during crises like those ongoing in Manipur.