Manipur High Court Seeks NIA Progress Report on Jiribam Abduction, Killings

Quick Summary:

• The Manipur High Court has directed the national Investigation Agency (NIA) to file a detailed progress report regarding the abduction and killing of six Meitei women and children during ethnic violence in Jiribam district last November.
• The order came in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Uripok Apunba Lup, a civil society group.
• Despite seven months as the incident, no progress report has been submitted by NIA, prompting the court to take serious note of delays.
• Additional time for filing chargesheets was sought by NIA; tho, the High Court emphasized accountability and set July 24 as the next hearing date while insisting that delays should be viewed seriously if chargesheets remain unsubmitted.
• NIA is also investigating two other cases from Jiribam:

– Alleged rape and burning alive of a Kuki-Zo woman on November 7.
– An attack on CRPF personnel in wich 10 militants were killed on November 11.

• Previously, despite taking over these cases, MHA argued before the court that law-and-order issues fall under state jurisdiction. Subsequently, Manipur’s political leadership shifted with CM Biren Singh resigning and President’s Rule being imposed.

Indian Opinion Analysis:

The directive issued by the Manipur High Court exemplifies judicial scrutiny over prolonged investigative delays concerning sensitive ethnic violence cases. With seven months passed since tragic incidents affecting Meitei community members in Jiribam district-and broader tensions lingering-it is crucial for agencies like NIA to expedite legal processes both for delivering justice and rebuilding community trust.

Furthermore, ongoing investigations into related violent episodes underscore concerns about deeper systemic challenges surrounding ethnic relations within Manipur. While legal outcomes offer some closure to affected communities-both Meiteis and Kukis-timely action is pivotal given existing intercommunity tensions exacerbated by socio-political instability under President’s Rule.

The judiciary remains one critical anchor ensuring accountability amidst policy ambiguities between central government agencies like MHA versus state governance structures now rendered temporarily defunct under emergency provisions.

Read More: Source Link