Quick Summary
- Progressive organisations in Mysuru have called for a fair, transparent, and autonomous investigation by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) into allegations surrounding the Dharmasthala ‘mass burials.’
- Activist Stanley emphasized that SIT should go beyond witness accounts and thoroughly examine FIRs, forensic evidence, DNA tests, and other materials pointing to serious offences.
- Concerns about witness safety were raised, stating some witnesses face suppression or intimidation. Witness protection is deemed essential.
- Kamal Gopinath from People’s Union for Civil Liberties urged the Home Minister to release an interim report to build public confidence. He stressed the need for a transparent and time-bound investigation.
- Representatives of Mahila Daurjanya Virodhi Okkoota and Odanadi highlighted their focus on justice for victims without targeting any institution. They advocated patience while asking for independence in SIT functioning.
- The groups condemned attempts by vested interests to derail investigations or impart religious motives to deflect from the case.
Indian Opinion Analysis
The call for a transparent and systematic approach in investigating allegations around Dharmasthala mass burials underscores critical issues concerning justice delivery mechanisms in India. Witness protection emerges as a pivotal aspect, as highlighted by activists citing intimidation tactics aimed at suppressing testimonies-a recurring concern in sensitive probes involving influential parties or institutions.
The emphasis on utilizing forensic evidence alongside witness accounts underlines the need for scientific rigor in resolving such cases.However, claims of external interference threaten institutional integrity; ensuring neutrality is crucial not just legally but also socially given implications toward public trust.
Calls for an interim report signify the larger demand within indian civil society circles: progress made visible builds credibility when tackling contentious allegations like these. Timely action would reinforce faith among citizens that sensitive issues can be addressed justly without falling prey to pressure tactics or diverted narratives.
read more: Link