Opposition Protests Appointment of Ex-BJP Spokesperson as Bombay HC Judge

Quick Summary

• opposition parties in Maharashtra have requested the revocation of the Supreme Court Collegium’s proposal to appoint former BJP spokesperson Aarti Sathe as a judge of the Bombay High court.
• NCP(SP) MLA Rohit Pawar raised concerns about potential bias,questioning whether people from other political affiliations would receive justice under her judicial rulings. He also highlighted lack of openness in the selection process for judgeships.
• Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut alleged that this appointment reflects an effort by the BJP to influence adn control the judiciary. Congress leader Vijay waddettiwar similarly called for withdrawal of the recommendation.
• The debate intensified after Rohit Pawar shared screenshots on social media showing Ms. Sathe’s recent past association with BJP as one of its state spokespersons.
• The BJP defended Ms. Sathe, clarifying that she severed ties with the party over two years ago and citing precedent from judicial appointments involving individuals previously connected to political parties.
• Advocate Aarti Sathe has significant experience handling tax disputes and has argued cases in various High Courts and the Supreme Court.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The recommendation by India’s Supreme Court Collegium for Advocate Aarti Sathe’s appointment as a Bombay High Court judge underscores deeper questions about transparency within judicial selections-a recurring concern voiced across party lines. Calls by opposition figures for revocation reflect apprehensions about perceived impartiality when judiciary appointees have prior political affiliations, even if legally permissible based on precedents cited.

For India, this controversy holds broader implications: maintaining trust in institutional independence is vital both symbolically and practically amid heightened public scrutiny on all branches of governance including its courts. Ensuring transparent communication regarding selection processes may reduce divisive speculation while supporting notions that professional merit over past affiliations drives appointments.

for more details: Read More