### Quick Summary
– Opposition MPs staged a walkout in Rajya Sabha during home Minister Amit Shah’s speech on Operation Sindoor, protesting PM Modi’s absence despite being present in Parliament.
– Congress Leader Mallikarjun Kharge called PM modi’s absence an insult to the Upper House after 16 hours of debate.
– Deputy Chairman Harvinash stated that the government decides who responds to debates, per rules discussed during Business Advisory meetings.- Opposition parties criticized India’s non-response to U.S. president Donald Trump’s repeated claims of brokering peace between India and Pakistan. RJD MP Manoj Kumar Jha proposed a resolution condemning Trump’s statements.
– CPI(M) MP John Brittas accused PM modi of avoiding direct mention of Trump while speaking extensively in Lok Sabha and criticized his stance on U.S. tariffs and diplomacy.
– Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut questioned the rationale behind declaring a ceasefire with Pakistan without significant returns like securing Kulbhushan jadhav or Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK).
– Samajwadi Party MP Javed Ali Khan pointed out that Defense Ministry has yet to respond to any session questions since Parliament opened two weeks ago despite designated opportunities for Q&A on Mondays.
– NCP MP Fauzia Khan remarked that Operation Sindoor lacks clarity, dismissing it as paused rather than concluded, while earlier promises regarding POK remain unfulfilled by BJP leadership.
– SP MP Jaya Bachchan criticized naming strategies like “Operation sindoor,” stating it undermined the grief of widows affected by military actions.
—
### Indian Opinion Analysis
The walkout by opposition MPs underscores rising tensions over parliamentary accountability and clarity as criticism mounts against multiple facets of governmental conduct-including PM Modi’s perceived lack of direct engagement in critical debates surrounding national security operations such as Operation Sindoor. While procedural norms allow decisions on delegation of duty for responses within Parliament, public perception may lean towards expecting leadership visibility when high-stakes matters are debated.
Concerns aired regarding strategic diplomatic responses-in light specifically with regards interactions atop global frameworks previously involving entities like ex-U-S(Player profiling n-Trump Key Statements ). illustrate broader long lingering external policy mood-shifts tracking Next-generation Geo therms/Onwards precisions Steps crossborder chair allocations/questions Raises(QWidget)” < Span-option-needed>>) .”Read More