Pakistan Dismisses Indian Statement on Pahalgam Attack as ‘Fabricated

Quick Summary

• On July 29, 2025, India’s Home Minister amit Shah briefed Parliament regarding Operation Sindoor, claiming Indian forces killed three alleged Pakistani militants linked to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack on tourists in Jammu and Kashmir.
• Mr. Shah stated that evidence had been found connecting thes individuals to the Pahalgam attack.
• Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry rejected these claims as baseless and provocative. It accused India of fabricating facts and glorifying conflict for domestic purposes.
• Pakistan alleged that India’s response led to civilian deaths in May during a military operation targeting alleged terrorist infrastructure, calling it a failed strategic initiative.
• The Pakistani spokesperson criticized India’s approach, including its decision not to accept Pakistan’s offer for an autonomous examination into the attack or adhere to bilateral treaties such as the Indus Waters Treaty.
• The statement condemned India’s rhetoric on nuclear threats while asserting Pakistan’s “discipline and restraint” in maintaining regional stability.

Indian Opinion Analysis

The contrasting narratives between India and Pakistan surrounding incidents like the Pahalgam Attack demonstrate how tensions remain deeply entrenched in South Asia’s geopolitical fabric. While India presents Operation Sindoor as evidence-backed accountability against militancy targeting civilians, Pakistan has challenged its credibility by proposing concerns over unilateral actions without clear investigations. This episode reflects escalating distrust between both nations.

India’s stated position highlights its focus on counter-terrorism measures aimed at securing national interests; though, persistent allegations from Pakistan about civilian casualties could influence international perspectives on accountability standards adhered to during cross-border operations.The diplomatic friction further underscores longstanding unresolved issues such as Kashmir and water-sharing disputes under frameworks like the Indus Waters treaty-critical areas requiring sustained dialog over confrontation.

Balancing security priorities with constructive engagement remains vital for both countries if regional peace is sought meaningfully amidst recurring cycles of hostilities.

Read more: The Hindu